Nuclearisation of Africa - Conference in pictures

Life in toxic wasteland no child's play

Written by  Friday, 20 March 2015 17:08
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Lucas Misapitso casually holds a handful of poisoned earth in his hands. Behind him, the forlorn shacks of Tudor Shaft huddle helplessly against a toxic mountain of mine tailings that splits them in two. 

 

The shack where Misapitso lives is located a few metres away from the mine dump that obtrudes from the informal settlement, in Krugersdorp, like a menace.

The 24-year old grew up here and the mound of toxic soil that has been declared a radiological hot spot is an unwelcome, though familiar, neighbour for his community.

When it rains, the tailings flood into his home and those of his 2 000 neighbours. When the wind blows, residents of the settlement are forced to ingest its fine dust, and the dust billowing from the surrounding mine dumps that encircle the bleak community.

The mine dump in Tudor shaft is so toxic and radioactive that several government agencies have recommended the community be urgently relocated. But Mogale City has only relocated a handful of residents living on top of the dump.

Misapitso, like many other residents, has grown impatient and has spent the past year lobbying government agencies and departments to intervene.

He looks dapper in a smart red shirt, matching red pants and a red hat, a pair of brown sharp-nosed shoes on his feet. He has to look good.

He is on his way to a meeting with Gauteng Health MEC Qedani Mahlangu to implore her to act on the plight of Tudor shaft. “I want to tell her how these mining companies came here, made their money and left – but not care about the suffering.”

Thanks to Misapitso’s lobbying efforts, the SA Human Rights Commission has launched its own investigation into the mining activities that “are alleged to cause harm to the well-being and health of the complainants.”

It has ordered the Mogale City municipality to provide it with a relocation plan, environmental impact assessment and other reports and records of any action taken by the municipality from the period it was first informed of the complaint.

Everywhere he goes, Misapitso carries a report by Professor Victor Tshivhase, of the Centre for Applied Radiation Science and Technology at the North West University.

In a study for the Department of Mineral Resources last year, Tshivhase recommended that residents be relocated to an alternative safe habitable area because of the high radiation levels.

Previously, radiation levels in Tudor Shaft [informal settlement] have been found to be 15 times higher than the regulatory limits. Studies, in 2010, by the National Nuclear Regulator determined that residents of Tudor Shaft are exposed to potentially dangerous levels of radiation.

The contamination, says Mariette Liefferink, the chief executive of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment, is not in dispute. “What is in dispute is the lack of action”, she says. “The dump did not fall from heaven.”

But Tudor Shaft is by no means unique. Across Gauteng, there are 1.6 million people living on mine dumps that are contaminated with uranium and toxic heavy metals, including rsenic, aluminium, manganese and mercury
But it’s here on the West Rand, argues Liefferink, where the toxic legacy of mining has hit hardest. Every day, more than 42 tons of hazardous dust from mine tailings enter the environment, generated through wind-borne and water.

She navigates the uneven terrain of the dump in an impossibly high pair of wedges. With a polka-dot scarf around her neck, Liefferink looks incongruous in the bleak surroundings. But
she has spent nine years, bringing hope where there is none and talking her crusade to Parliament. “I feel I’m a part of this community now”, she says.

Several years ago, Liefferink’s organisation quashed attempts by the authorities and Mintails, a local mining outfit to [unlawfully] remove the mine dump arguing it would cause more harm.

The Department of Environmental Affairs has now appointed its own radiation specialist to conduct “radiological and health assessments’, which are expected to be completed within six months.

But as government departments squabble over who must take charge, the community pays the price, laments Misapitso. Tudor Shaft is as old as democracy, he says, but its very existence is a symbol that democracy has failed the poorest of the poor.

Several studies have showed how exposure to high levels of radioactive uranium can lead to birth defects and brain disorders while the heavy metals in the waste are cancer-causing.
Community members complain of respiratory problems and skin lesions.

Another resident Gloria Mkhehlane, cradles her twin boys. She says: “they battle to breathe at night. I don’t know what to do. We need the government to help us but no one comes.”

MINING

FSE COMMENTS - Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project

Comments on the Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project: Wetland Sensitivity Mapping and Impact Assessment Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Lindum Railway Decommissioning Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Millsite Reclamation Surface Water Assessment Report Groundwater Assessment Report Integrated Water Use Licence Application for the Sibanye-Stillwater Rand Uranium/Cooke Operations Integrated Water and Waste Management Plan in support of the WULA   The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for Sustainable Environment (FSE). The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

Presentations at the conference "Sustainable Use of Abandoned Mines in the SADC Region"

Presentations, including the FSE’s presentation, held at the conference “Linki...

Palmietkuilen Coal Mining Project Rejected

The Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD) has refused ...

SA NEWS

Battle to save Marico's river

De Beers has secured rights to prospect for kimberlite in the sensitive catchment of Groot Marico, but residents worry that minim firms could damage their pristine river, writes Sheree Bega

Saturday Star - No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water

Saturday Star January 27 2018 No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water   Sheree Bega   South Africa’s water scarcity could rapidly get worse as supply contracts and demand escalates due to growth, urbanisation, unsustainable use, degradation of wetlands, water losses and a decline in rainfall because of climate change. This is one of the warnings contained in the new draft National Master Plan for Water and Sanitation. Based on current demand projections, the water deficit confronting the country could be between 2.7 and 3.8 billion cubic metres, a gap of about 17%, by 2030. As of July last year, according to the draft plan, South Africa has consumed more water per capita at about 237 * /c/d than the world average of around 173 * /c/d. To address crippling water shortages, desalinated sea water in coastal areas, and treated waste water, will increasingly be brought into the water mix - together with an increase in the use of groundwater. Desalination plants should “not be implemented as an emergency scheme, only to be used intermittently or during times of drought and inadequate supply from the conventional water resources,” the draft plan cautions. “These schemes are too costly to be moth-balled for any length of time.”

THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS

  POLITICS WEB MINING AND PEOPLE: THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS INTRODUCTION AND SYNOPSIS There are two ways of looking at mining in South Africa. The first is to see it as a sunset industry plagued by rising costs, technical difficulties, and political hostility. The second is to see it as an industry well positioned for a new lease of life despite all the vicissitudes. Even though the attractiveness of South Africa for mining investment has declined, the country still has the world's richest reserves of precious minerals and base metals. Companies both large and small would like to exploit these. Some are doing so despite the political threats. Even more will do so if the threats can be effectively managed or reduced. According to the Chamber of Mines, investment over the next few years could almost double in the absence of threats.

FSE’s Preliminary Comments on the Minister of Water and Sanitation’s decision to consolidate the 9 Catchment Management Agencies into one Catchment Management Agency.

  (Reg. No. 2007/003002/08) NPO NUMBER 062986-NPO PBO No. (TAX EXEMPT) 930 039 506 Postnet Suite 87 Private Bag X033 RIVONIA 2128   COMMENTS ON THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION’S DECISION TO IMPLEMENT A SINGLE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (CMA) TO PERFORM WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FUNCTION IN THE NINE WATER MANAGEMENT AREAS.  The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment. The Federation for a Sustainable Environment (FSE) is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. The FSE’s mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

WATER

SUBMISSION ON THE DWS MASTER PLAN

WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE DRAFT 2.6: NATIONAL WATER AND SANITATION MASTER PLAN (NW&SMP)  In this document, the Federation for a Sustainable Environment (“FSE”) submits comments on the National Water and Sanitation Master Plan, draft 2.6 (the “draft plan”).  THE FSE:  The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.    In accordance with the above-mentioned mission, the FSE’s comments are limited to matters pertaining to the mining industry. The FSE’s comments will be substantiated by real examples within the scope of the FSE’s experience and our active participation in a significant number of environmental impacts assessments, environmental management programme reports, water use license applications, environmental authorisations, steering committees, forums, task teams, teams of experts, academic research groups, boards, etc. over a period of 15 (fifteen years).[1] [1] Kindly note that the Legal Resources Centre assisted with this publication.

Coalition defending Mpumalanga water source area

Last week, the coalition of eight civil society and community organisations that...