Nuclearisation of Africa - Conference in pictures
Most of the new demand for uranium will come from Asian countries, which are spending about $800-billion on reactors Most of the new demand for uranium will come from Asian countries, which are spending about $800-billion on reactors Creamer Media

Demand Spur

Written by  Friday, 29 January 2016 13:16
Rate this item
(0 votes)

The future of the uranium mining industry will be largely dependent on the price of the commodity and the profitability of uranium mines, while demand for uranium in nuclear power stations and potentially for nuclear weapons remains the main driver for the commodity.

 

This is according to North-West University Mine Water Research Group head and geography and environmental studies chair Professor Frank Winde, who spoke at the Nuclearisation of Africa symposium in Kempton Park, on the East Rand, in November.

He stressed that the mining of uranium must be analysed in a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis, which had to include all externalised costs, such as its impact on the environment and the health of local communities.

“Consultation must be undertaken widely and not only with the mining industry and scientists, but also with communities that will be affected by uranium mining. There also has to be complete transparency about the details of the development and operation of uranium mining operations with all stakeholders,” Winde contended.

When the issue of uranium mining was being discussed, all parties needed to avoid lobbyism, taking stances based on ideology and raw emotions to ensure that sober, rational conclusions can be reached.

“Parties must present track records and scientific facts, instead of relying on models, predictions and promises to support their arguments. Most importantly, everyone should not discount long-term costs for short-term benefits,” Winde reasoned. 

Global nuclear generation capacity is set to grow from its current capacity of 379 gigawatt electric (GWe) to 552 GWe by 2035, which  could increase the demand for uranium significantly, says the World Nuclear Association (WNA) in its 2015 Nuclear Fuel report.

WNA director-general Agneta Rising adds that nuclear electricity output is set to increase at a faster rate over the next five years than was the case for the past 20 years.

According to the WNA, there are currently 438 operable reactors around the world, 65 reactors in the construction phase and 165 reactors in the planning phase.

The WNA notes that most of the new demand for uranium will come from Asian countries, including but not limited to China and India,  hich are spending about $800-billion on reactors in a push for new power plants with lower carbon emissions.

The Nuclear Energy Association states in its 2014 ‘Uranium: Resources, Production and Demand’ publication that, should nuclear capacity be expanded to between 399 GWe and 678 GWe by 2035, uranium requirements will increase from 59 170 t of uranium metal at the end of 2013 to between 72 205 t and 122 150 t by 2035.

JSE-listed investment holding company Oakbay Resources & Energy is also upbeat about the long-term prospects for the uranium industry.

“It is estimated that uranium demand will grow to 266-million pounds a year by 2030, up from the current 140-million pounds a year. Uranium prices are also forecast to rise by 65% to 85% by 2017, as a result of an expected increase in demand and potential supply shortages,” said Oakbay CEO Varun Gupta during a site visit to the company’s Shiva uranium mine, in the North West province of South Africa, in September. He explained that uranium demand was predominantly driven by its use in nuclear power generation, pointing out that there were about 355 operating nuclear power plants worldwide with 45 to 70 under construction and another 366 either in planning or at proposal stage worldwide. 

However, according to Paris-based nuclear energy consultancy Mycle Schneider Consulting’s 2015 ‘The World Nuclear Industry Status’  reports the nuclear industry “remains in decline”.

“The 391 operating reactors – excluding those defined as being in long-term outage – are 47 fewer than the 2002 peak of 438, while the total installed capacity peaked in  2010 at 368 GWe before declining by 8% to 337 GWe, which is comparable to levels last seen two decades ago.

“Annual nuclear electricity generation reached 2 410 TWh in 2014, which is a 2.2% increase over the previous year, but 9.4% below the historic peak in 2006,” the report states.

Creamer Media’s Research Channel Africa’s ‘2015 Uranium’ report states that, although the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident has affected nuclear power projects and policies in some countries, nuclear power remains a key part of the global energy mix. This bodes well for uranium demand, which is expected to continue to increase for the foreseeable future.

The report says several governments have plans for new nuclear power, with big nuclear expansion forecast in China and India. Japan’s nuclear restart will also boost investor confidence in the long-term viability of the global nuclear power industry.

The uranium market is expected to be “adequately supplied” from primary and secondary sources up to 2025, provided that all mines currently under development or planned enter service.

However, beyond 2025, the WNA states that further production will be required to meet nuclear energy demand.

Meanwhile, speaking at the Nuclearisation of Africa symposium, international civil society organisation Mineral Policy Institute deputy chairperson Mia Pepper said that, since the Fukushima incident, the uranium price had fallen sharply from around $100/lb to as low as $25/lb and, at the time, was hovering at about $36/lb.

She noted that Australia possessed 35% of the world’s uranium resources and had three operational uranium mines. These include Ranger mine, in the Northern Territory, and the Olympic Dam and Beverley mines, both in South Australia.

Other uranium mines were shut down, owing to low uranium prices.

“Uranium production in Australia in 2015 declined to 5 897 t of uranium, which is a ten-year low. According to Australian research  company IBISWorld’s March 2015 market research report, Australia’s uranium mines employed only 987 people, with a negative yearly growth rate of 2.4% in the sector,” stated Pepper.

She commented that the share value of uranium miners in 2015 declined significantly. Uranium miner Energy Resources of Australia posted a half-year net loss of $255-million in 2015, including write-downs of $197-million, while Africa-focused uranium miner Paladin Energy posted a full-year loss of $368.8-million in 2015. 

“Several uranium projects have been

delayed or abandoned. Expansion plans at the Ranger and Olympic Dam mines have been put on hold as well,” Pepper highlighted.

Further, she noted that local communities in Australia had become increasingly vocal in their opposition to the establishment of

uranium mines with companies, such as French nuclear vendor Areva having been forced to abandon uranium projects as a result. “We have also seen in Alice Springs that uranium miners Cameco and Paladin were forced to withdraw plans to develop uranium mines in the region, owing to local opposition,” Pepper pointed out.

Health and Environmental Concerns 

French independent nuclear watchdog group Commission for Independent Research and Information radiation laboratory director Bruno  hareyron stated during his address at the Nuclearisation of Africa symposium that uranium waste material was often highly radioactive because it contained pieces of uranium ore.

“The concentration of uranium in uranium waste rocks can typically be 100 times above the normal concentration levels of uranium that is found in the ground.”

Additionally, Society of Rural Physicians of Canada member Dr Dale Dewar noted during her presentation at the symposium that uranium was a heavy metal with the potential to cause a spectrum of adverse health effects ranging from renal failure and diminished bone growth to damage to peoples’ DNA, or deoxyribonucleic acid.

She explained that, because uranium possessed chemical toxicity and radioactivity, assessing the relative contributions of each to its toxic profile was difficult.

However, Dewar stated that the effects of low-level radioactivity included cancer, shortening of life and subtle changes in fertility or viability of offspring, as determined from animal studies and data on Hiroshima and Chernobyl survivors.

“These effects can be delayed for decades or for generations and are not detected in short-term toxicological studies,” she added.

Dewar highlighted that uranium was chemically toxic to the proximal tubules of the kidney, although the damage was reversible, at least in the early stages.

Niger nongovernmental organisation Aghirin'man president Almoustapha Alhacen said during his presentation at the Nuclearisation of  Africa symposium on the impact of uranium mining in Niger, that independent campaigning organisation Greenpeace Africa and other International organisations had been reporting regularly on how Areva’s uranium mines and mills had “endangered the people and their environment” in the country.

Niger is the world’s fourth-largest uranium-producing country and, in 2014, retained its position as Africa’s largest uranium producer. The country’s production was 4 057 t in 2014, compared with 4 518 t in 2013.

French nuclear energy giant Areva is a shareholder of the two long-standing uranium mining companies, Société des Mines de l’Aïr (Somaïr) and Compagnie Minière d’Akouta (Cominak).

The Somaïr mine, in the Arlit region, and the Cominak mine, in the Akouta region, were established at the end of the 1960s and both of them are nearing the end of their operational life span. In 2014, Somaïr and Cominak produced 2 331 t and 1 501 t of uranium respectively. Areva and Niger signed a strategic partnership agreement in May 2014, which among other things included a five-year renewal of Somaïr’s and Cominak’s mining agreements.

Alhacen lamented that the exploitation of uranium in Niger since 1968 had serious consequences for the environment, which included  depletion of ground water, disappearance of the existing vegetation cover, the total deformation of the landscape with the formation of extracted rock mountains, loss of wildlife, and the dispersion of radiologically contaminated scrap metal and materials in the city of Arlit and the rest of the country.

He also stressed that diseases among uranium mineworkers and local community members were rife, which included congenital malformations and gynecological problems. These diseases Alhacen attributed to contamination from uranium toxicity and radioactivity.

 

For a short videoo clip and the article, please visit: http://www.miningweekly.com/article/nuclear-energy-weapons-still-driving-uranium-demand-environmental-and-health-concerns-persist-2016-01-29 

MINING

THE FSE’s COMMENTS ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN REPORT BLYVOOR GOLD MINING PROJECT BVG 4880

THE FSE’s COMMENTS ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN REPORT BLYVOOR GOLD MINING PROJECT BVG 4880   Find the document attached for download.

Court victory for South Africa’s protected areas in Mabola case

On Thursday, the 8th of November 2018, the North Gauteng High Court set asi...

SA NEWS

Mintails placed into final liquidation

BUSINESS DAY Mintails placed into final liquidation Department of Mineral Resources will join long line of creditors hoping to recoup money 20 September 2018 - 17:27 Lisa Steyn

BUSINESS DAY EXCLUSIVE: Liquidation allows Mintails to shirk environmental liabilities

21 August 2018 - 05:04 Mark Olalde   Pollution: Water resource management consultant Anthony Turton, with the Mintails gold plants and water treatment tanks in the background. Picture: BUSINESS DAY/FREDDY MAVUNDA Mintails Mining and several related companies have announced their liquidation, throwing into question the environmental rehabilitation of highly polluting operations near Johannesburg. Mintails mines and processes gold from a sprawling 1,715ha complex of waste piles and open pits in Krugersdorp and has for years been flagged for noncompliance. Its operations are bordered by informal settlements and suburbs housing thousands of residents, many of whom have complained of health effects, which they blame on radioactive dust and water pollution from Mintails’ mines. Records show that the cost to clean up the environment would be about R330m, but there is only R25.6m available. Observers fear that the situation could deteriorate further, as happened at the Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mine, an abandoned large-scale operation on the West Rand. A case study in the country’s deeply flawed mine closure system, Mintails teetered on the verge of collapse for years and entered business rescue in October 2015. Mariette Liefferink, the activist CEO of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment, tracked Mintails for more than a decade and is now working to intercede in the liquidation proceedings as the legal voice for what she labels the "mute environment". "There was poor planning. [Mintails’] due diligence was flawed. They overestimated the gold grade and the resource that could be reclaimed. "They continued to exploit the resource, to reclaim only the profitable parts and never top up the financial provisions," Liefferink says. As the company slips into liquidation, it passes the brunt of its environmental liability to taxpayers and, to an extent, to other mining companies. After Mintails fought for nearly three years to save the company, business rescue practitioner Dave Lake notified the Johannesburg high court in early August of his intention to liquidate the company. Provisional liquidation was granted on August 17 and a liquidator is expected to be appointed soon. THERE IS NO LONGER A REASONABLE PROSPECT OF RESCUING THE COMPANY. The business rescue plan called for the refurbishment of a gold ore processing plant but, according to a memo dated August 1 that Lake sent to the court and to affected parties, it failed when multiple investors ceased funding Mintails. "There is no longer a reasonable prospect of rescuing the company," the memo read. The liquidator will now decide how to pay back creditors with the remaining assets. Environmentalists fear this process could leave environmental liabilities low on the list of what deserves money. According to the business rescue plan, written in December 2016, Mintails owed various creditors more than R1bn, including a shortfall of about R300m in reclamation funding. Due to a web of involved companies, it remains unclear if a large portion of the already insufficient financial provisions can be accessed for environmental cleanup. DRDGold formerly held one of the mining rights and the corresponding trust fund, which are now in the Mintails group. DRDGold CEO Niël Pretorius says he believes that the trust fund contained R18m but he did not identify the trustees, whose consent is vital to unlocking the money. Documents show the Mintails group acknowledged that rehabilitation would probably cost between R300m and R336.5m, but it declined to top up financial provisions. According to the environmental management programme from one of Mintails’ mining rights: "These liabilities are also historic and predate Mintails’ involvement and should thus not be for Mintails’ account." Experts debate this narrow interpretation of the law. Lake wrote in the business rescue plan: "The Mintails group’s rehabilitation liabilities have remained largely unfunded for some time, and there are simply no free funds available to the [business rescue practitioner] to enable him to immediately provide such funding." Legal Resources Centre attorney Lucien Limacher is representing the Federation for a Sustainable Environment. "This is a trend that has been occurring for a couple of years where mining companies have undertaken a business rescue plan or have applied for liquidation because they have failed to really look after the rehabilitation fund," he says. The Legal Resources Centre sent letters to several government agencies, including the department of mineral resources, the department of water & sanitation and the department of energy, asking them to intervene in the situation and threatening to pursue legal action if the department of mineral resources fails to act. Department of water & sanitation spokesperson Sputnik Ratau says they are "engaging Mintails so that the immediate measures can be put into place to ensure water resources protection. A longer-term plan is required to ensure rehabilitation of the mining-impacted areas." Lake declines to answer questions about the failed business rescue and the liquidation but he wrote for Moneyweb in January 2017 and laid out his argument for Mintails’ use of business rescue: "Mintails was sick – but it wasn’t terminal." Now the situation has become what Liefferink calls "pass the parcel", with Mintails playing the part of a "scavenger company", a term coined by researchers to describe under-resourced outfits that buy the scraps left over from larger mining companies and ultimately abandon them. Large gold, coal and platinum mines rarely, if ever, properly close in SA and there wasn’t one large-scale mine in Gauteng that achieved full, legal closure between 2011 and 2016. Mintails’ case will not affect the law that ring-fences financial assurances for reclamation, Limacher says. "But it is precedent-setting in that mines might now start applying for liquidation to avoid paying the cost of rehabilitation." Mintails’ West Rand concessions came in part from DRDGold, which also remines waste piles, and from Mogale Gold, which was in judicial management when Mintails acquired it in 2006. Since then, Mintails engaged in a pattern of environmental degradation. For example, the department of water & sanitation found in an August 2014 inspection that Mintails transported "slurry/sludge" in unlined trenches, completed insufficient monitoring, spilled slurry from pipelines and implemented no storm water management system at a pollution control dam. In December 2016, polluted runoff from waste piles was found to be seeping through a dam wall into the Wonderfonteinspruit, which has immediate downstream agricultural uses in the community of Kagiso. Now it will largely be up to the liquidator and regulators to protect the environment and public health. "That is the pattern that seems to be followed in the gold mining industry, and, I assume, would be followed in the coal and platinum mining industries, as well. "As soon as a mine is no longer very profitable, it transfers its assets," Liefferink says. "That seems to have the tacit support of the department of mineral resources." However, the department of mineral resources sent a statement that reads: "The department will engage with the appointed provisional liquidators with the intention to safeguard the environmental and social responsibilities." Mintails former CEO Johan Moolman declined to comment except to say he quit on June 26 when he learned a new investor had bought the company. Mvest Capital agreed to purchase Mintails from Paige, a vehicle of the UK-based Harbour family, with the understanding that Mvest would inject R30m into the beleaguered company to stimulate the business rescue plan. Mvest decided against handing over the full amount, paying only R5.5m. Mvest director Matthew Moodley acknowledges the initial agreement and the R5.5m. He says that after a month it became apparent the deal would require more investment to succeed. "With the increased need for working capital in July, Mvest took a decision to withdraw from the transaction," Moodley says, adding that Mvest did not "conclude a transaction with Paige". Liefferink says these companies are all "jumping from a sinking ship". She fears Mintails will go the way of the abandoned Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mine, which was once one of the country’s most productive gold operations and is now a source of pollution, violent illegal mining gangs and headaches for adjacent mines. Mintails has followed a strikingly similar pattern. In the Blyvooruitzicht case, two companies, DRDGold and Village Main Reef, almost completed a business deal to sell the nearly exhausted mine and both walked away, claiming the other carried responsibility. "That whole area, just like Blyvooruitzicht, will be left like it is," Liefferink said. While neighbouring mining companies will probably have to pump water from the void in Mintails’ absence, the consequences of "the dust fallout and the toxic water in the river systems" will be carried by communities and by the municipality. oxpeckers.org Additional reporting by #MineAlert manager Tholakele Nene https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/companies/mining/2018-08-21-liquidation-allows-mintails-to-shirk-environmental-liabilities/

WATER

Pollution of the Vaal

THE FSE PRESENTED ON INVITATION TO THE SOUTH AFRICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISION ON THE POLLUTION OF THE VAAL.  ATTACHED ARE THE PRESENTATIONS.

Water Crisis

More than two decades ago, science advocate IsmailMore than two decades ago, sci...

SUMMARY OF WATER RELATED CHALLENGES IN SOUTH AFRICA 2018

SUMMARY OF WATER RELATED CHALLENGES IN SOUTH AFRICA 2018 INTRODUCTION This su...