Nuclearisation of Africa - Conference in pictures

It’s all about the money

Written by  Dewald van Rensburg Wednesday, 02 August 2017 11:59
Rate this item
(0 votes)

The hazardous mining by-product raises two questions – who’s to blame and who should pay.

The acid mine drainage crisis is going to cost someone a lot of money, but probably not the people who caused it. The “polluter pays” principle was next to impossible to apply to the acid mine drainage problem in a retrospective way, said Marius Keet, chief director for mine water management at the department of water and sanitation.

“We have tried. According to our legal representative some years ago, it just was not possible.

“On which doors do you knock? Where do you go to? Who are these people?

“We all know that we have legacies inherited from the late 1800s,” said Keet.

“The idea is not to go back, the idea is to be more proactive in terms of what will happen in future,” he said this week at the launch of a booklet on mine rehabilitation by environmentalist Mariette Liefferink of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment.

Liefferink said the arguments against retrospective liability for acid mine drainage are overblown.

“There is a complete database of mines at the Council of Geoscience. The retrospectivity of the polluter-pays principle is an integral part of the National Water Management Act and the National Environmental Management Act. We would advocate for retrospectivity.”

Finding past polluters would also help the currently existing industry, she suggested.

“Most of the last-men-standing mines consider it unpalatable and inequitable that they should be liable for pollution caused over 150 years.”

In 2004, acid mine drainage started decanting out of old mines on the West Rand. Mines need to be constantly dewatered and, as mines have closed, pumping has ceased in many deep gold shafts, leaving them to get flooded. This water is highly acidic and dissolves hazardous metals, including the uranium that is a common by-product in Witwatersrand gold ore.

THE STATE OF PLAY

The agency implementing the short- and long-term acid mine drainage solutions is the Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority.

It has three plants that pump acid mine drainage from the ground, partially treat it and discharge it into Gauteng’s river systems.

Between 150 and 200 megalitres of acid mine drainage water pass through these per day, costing just below R6 000 per megalitre, or roughly R1 million per day.

Partial treatment means adding lime to neutralise the water’s pH level. This makes most of the dangerous metals precipitate in a sludge that has to be disposed of. The resulting water is still contaminated with especially sulphates, but can be released into rivers.

“At least it is a lot better than what you can expect when you have it freely decanting,” said Keet.

Water levels in the central and eastern basins of the Witwatersrand are now falling instead of rising.

In the critical western basin, the rising water has at least been slowed down, said Keet.

“It has not stopped, but we’ve definitely reduced it.” The next step is to treat that water to a level where it can be sold to industrial and ultimately residential users.

“There needs to be a paradigm shift in South Africa about not being able to drink acid mine drainage. You can treat any quality water to any quality water, the cost is the issue,” said Keet.

The design of the long-term solution depended on who the buyers of the water ended up being, he said.

The long-term solution is meant to be operational by 2021 and the contractor to do an environmental impact assessment will “hopefully” be appointed within the next month, said Keet.

THE ECONOMICS OF ACID MINE DRAINAGE

Ideally, the long-term acid mine drainage solution should pay for itself by producing saleable water and possibly some mineral by-products. However, at current water prices, this is far-fetched.

The price to beat would be Rand Water’s tariff for water from the Vaal River – roughly R4.50 per kilolitre. That is more or less impossible, even with cheaper, new treatment technologies instead of the standard option – the electricityintensive desalination process called reverse osmosis. Mintek, the state’s science council for mineral processing, is punting a process it calls Savmin, which relies on a chemical reaction that uses less power. Mintek general manager Alan McKenzie said it can treat acid mine drainage at anything between R5 and R15 per kilolitre, “depending on the water you start with”.

A breakeven cost of roughly R20 per kilolitre is in the ballpark, but this is before any costs associated with disposing of the waste products or reticulation of the water to reach customers, said McKenzie. Johannesburg Water charges more than R30 to big water users, so, hypothetically, direct supply to a large industrial user could be cost competitive, he said.

“I don’t want to say water is too cheap now, but ... somewhere in the future, where technologies improve and water gets more expensive, you could sell water and break even,” said Keet.

“The money has to come from somewhere and unfortunately, at the end of the day, it is probably going to be government. I just don’t see another way around it,” said McKenzie.

STOPPING THE DAMAGE

The department published a new mine water management policy paper last week that makes some far-reaching proposals – at least for the mines that remain. Among the proposals are restrictions on selling old mines to evade closure costs.

The problem of mines going into liquidation with no funding in place for rehabilitation is another target and an environmental levy on mines is being mooted.

MINING

FSE COMMENTS - Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project

Comments on the Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project: Wetland Sensitivity Mapping and Impact Assessment Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Lindum Railway Decommissioning Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Millsite Reclamation Surface Water Assessment Report Groundwater Assessment Report Integrated Water Use Licence Application for the Sibanye-Stillwater Rand Uranium/Cooke Operations Integrated Water and Waste Management Plan in support of the WULA   The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for Sustainable Environment (FSE). The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

Presentations at the conference "Sustainable Use of Abandoned Mines in the SADC Region"

Presentations, including the FSE’s presentation, held at the conference “Linki...

Palmietkuilen Coal Mining Project Rejected

The Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD) has refused ...

SA NEWS

Battle to save Marico's river

De Beers has secured rights to prospect for kimberlite in the sensitive catchment of Groot Marico, but residents worry that minim firms could damage their pristine river, writes Sheree Bega

Saturday Star - No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water

Saturday Star January 27 2018 No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water   Sheree Bega   South Africa’s water scarcity could rapidly get worse as supply contracts and demand escalates due to growth, urbanisation, unsustainable use, degradation of wetlands, water losses and a decline in rainfall because of climate change. This is one of the warnings contained in the new draft National Master Plan for Water and Sanitation. Based on current demand projections, the water deficit confronting the country could be between 2.7 and 3.8 billion cubic metres, a gap of about 17%, by 2030. As of July last year, according to the draft plan, South Africa has consumed more water per capita at about 237 * /c/d than the world average of around 173 * /c/d. To address crippling water shortages, desalinated sea water in coastal areas, and treated waste water, will increasingly be brought into the water mix - together with an increase in the use of groundwater. Desalination plants should “not be implemented as an emergency scheme, only to be used intermittently or during times of drought and inadequate supply from the conventional water resources,” the draft plan cautions. “These schemes are too costly to be moth-balled for any length of time.”

THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS

  POLITICS WEB MINING AND PEOPLE: THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS INTRODUCTION AND SYNOPSIS There are two ways of looking at mining in South Africa. The first is to see it as a sunset industry plagued by rising costs, technical difficulties, and political hostility. The second is to see it as an industry well positioned for a new lease of life despite all the vicissitudes. Even though the attractiveness of South Africa for mining investment has declined, the country still has the world's richest reserves of precious minerals and base metals. Companies both large and small would like to exploit these. Some are doing so despite the political threats. Even more will do so if the threats can be effectively managed or reduced. According to the Chamber of Mines, investment over the next few years could almost double in the absence of threats.

FSE’s Preliminary Comments on the Minister of Water and Sanitation’s decision to consolidate the 9 Catchment Management Agencies into one Catchment Management Agency.

  (Reg. No. 2007/003002/08) NPO NUMBER 062986-NPO PBO No. (TAX EXEMPT) 930 039 506 Postnet Suite 87 Private Bag X033 RIVONIA 2128   COMMENTS ON THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION’S DECISION TO IMPLEMENT A SINGLE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (CMA) TO PERFORM WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FUNCTION IN THE NINE WATER MANAGEMENT AREAS.  The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment. The Federation for a Sustainable Environment (FSE) is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. The FSE’s mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

WATER

SUBMISSION ON THE DWS MASTER PLAN

WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE DRAFT 2.6: NATIONAL WATER AND SANITATION MASTER PLAN (NW&SMP)  In this document, the Federation for a Sustainable Environment (“FSE”) submits comments on the National Water and Sanitation Master Plan, draft 2.6 (the “draft plan”).  THE FSE:  The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.    In accordance with the above-mentioned mission, the FSE’s comments are limited to matters pertaining to the mining industry. The FSE’s comments will be substantiated by real examples within the scope of the FSE’s experience and our active participation in a significant number of environmental impacts assessments, environmental management programme reports, water use license applications, environmental authorisations, steering committees, forums, task teams, teams of experts, academic research groups, boards, etc. over a period of 15 (fifteen years).[1] [1] Kindly note that the Legal Resources Centre assisted with this publication.

Coalition defending Mpumalanga water source area

Last week, the coalition of eight civil society and community organisations that...